Translate Metals Mining News

Monday, June 23, 2014

Australia Gold: Cheap Gold Mining Stocks Surge






Gold stocks have surged dramatically in recent weeks, defying the odds to catch a serious bid.  Extreme bearishness still plagues this sector, which is certainly the most despised in all the stock markets.  So why are investors returning?  The universally-hated gold stocks are absurdly cheap, easily the greatest bargains anywhere.  And after a long year of basing, they are finally breaking out relative to the gold price.
It’s easy to understand why everyone hates the precious-metals sector these days.  During the first half of 2013 when the mighty S&P 500 general-stock index powered 12.6% higher, gold plunged 26.4%.  Thanks to the Fed’s stock-market levitation, American stock traders dumped the dominant GLD gold ETF at epic record rates, flooding the gold market with excess supply.  The resulting gold drop obliterated gold stocks.
Their primary index, the HUI gold-stock index, plummeted by 48.7% over that span!  So this entire sector was abandoned, left for dead by existing investors and avoided like the Black Death by new investors.  Bearishness was off the charts, with widespread predictions gold and its miners’ stocks were doomed to spiral lower forever.  Yet like nearly all popular forecasts at market extremes, that one was dead wrong.
The precious-metals sector instead stabilized over this past year, drawing a line in the sand and basing.  As of this week, gold is up 3.4% and the HUI merely off 0.9% since the end of last June.  Not the worst sector sentiment seen in decades, not stupendous record gold and silver futures shorting, not even the Fed’s ongoing stock-market levitation could force the precious metals lower.  New buying absorbed all the selling.
And that brings us to today, where the precious metals are surging to break out of this year-long base.  And this is happening in the midst of the dreaded summer doldrums no less, the weakest time of the year seasonally for this sector totally devoid of recurring investment-demand spikes.  So much strength now is a harbinger of a sea-change shift in capital flows back into gold stocks, which are exceedingly undervalued.
The vast majority of investors have woefully short memories, forgetting the past to delude themselves into believing the last year-and-a-half were normal for precious metals.  Nothing could be farther from the truth!  Between November 2000 and September 2011 when the S&P 500 retreated 14.2% in a brutal secular bear, the HUI skyrocketed 1664.4% higher!  When gold stocks are moving, great fortunes are won.
Fundamentally, few sectors are simpler and easier to understand than gold miners.  These companies wrest the shiny yellow metal from the bowels of the earth, and then sell it at market prices.  Thus their overall profitability, and resulting earnings-per-share measures that drive future stock prices, are utterly dominated by the gold price.  When gold rises, gold-mining profits leverage these gains to soar higher.
So the best way to view gold-stock price levels from an investing standpoint is through the lens of their relationship with gold.  For nearly a decade now, I’ve done extensive research into trading this sector using the HUI/Gold Ratio.  The daily close in that leading gold-stock index is simply divided by the daily close in gold, and the resulting ratio charted.  This has led to massive profits from timing buying and selling. 
But these days more and more investors are shifting their capital away from holding individual stocks into exchange-traded funds.  This trend is understandable yet unfortunate, as a carefully-handpicked sector portfolio of elite stocks will nearly always outperform the broader baskets held by ETFs.  But that’s the way things are going, for better or for worse.  So I’ve long been wondering about the HGR’s ETF equivalent.
The HUI itself can’t be bought, but the flagship GDX Gold Miners ETF can be.  GDX is a worthy gold-stock benchmark, as it is well-constructed with quality component gold and silver stocks and tracks the classic HUI almost perfectly.  And if GDX is replacing the HUI in the gold-stock/gold ratio numerator, why not throw in the GLD gold ETF in the denominator?  So this week I took my first deeper look at the GDX/GLD Ratio.
This new GGR is functionally identical to the old HGR, quantifying gold-stock price levels relative to the underlying gold price which drives their profits and hence ultimately stock prices.  So naturally the GGR reveals the same picture the HGR has, that gold-stock prices have been losing ground relative to gold for a long time and are radically undervalued.  Here’s the chart since GDX’s first full year of trading in 2007.
The blue GGR is slaved to the right axis, and shows gold stocks’ performance relative to gold.  When the GGR is rising, gold stocks are outperforming gold.  This can be from either rallying faster than gold in major uplegs, or falling slower than gold in major corrections.  But the latter never actually happens.  When the GGR is falling, gold is outperforming gold stocks by rising faster in uplegs or falling slower in corrections.

Incredibly for nearly 7 years now, gold stocks have been underperforming gold on balance!  The GGR has done little more than fall and fall and fall.  Other than the 17-year secular bulls and bears endlessly oscillating through stock-market history, any trend in any market running for 7 years is exceedingly rare.  Most trends reverse after 4 years, 5 on the outside.  The longer any trend runs, the bigger the subsequent mean reversion.
So right off the bat, it’s immediately obvious there is a huge anomaly in gold-stock pricing today.  No matter how vociferously the bears argue, gold stocks aren’t going to fall relative to gold and therefore their profits forever.  At some point this trend, which is essentially a secular bear in gold-stock sentiment, will absolutely reverse.  And odds are this past year’s basing has finally ushered in that critical inflection point.
To game where this hated sector is heading, we first have to understand how it got here.  Back in 2007 before 2008’s once-in-a-lifetime stock panic, the GGR averaged 0.591x over the first 8 calendar quarters of GDX’s existence.  The share price of the GDX gold-stock ETF meandered around 0.6x the share price of the GLD gold ETF.  Even if these pre-panic levels never return, today’s ultra-low GGR is wildly bullish for gold stocks.
During that epic stock panic, the extreme general-stock selling led to gargantuan safe-haven demand for the US dollar (cash).  So as the US Dollar Index skyrocketed in its biggest and fastest rally ever witnessed over such a short span in late 2008, the alternative currency gold was hammered in crazy-heavy futures selling.  So gold fell too during the stock panic, terrifying gold-stock investors into panicking as well.
Gold stocks plummeted so much faster than gold that by late October 2008 near the panic’s nadir the GGR had free-fallen to just 0.227x.  Gold stocks were trading at just 3/8ths of their pre-panic levels relative to gold which drives their profits, which was absurdly cheap as I pointed out at the time using the HGR.  And as expected, after being loathed and extremely undervalued gold stocks started soaring again.
Mean reversions out of extremes are the most powerful and profitable forces in all the financial markets.  Riding one has enormous benefits for your wealth.  Over the next several years after those super-irrational stock-panic lows, gold stocks as measured by GDX would more than quadruple with a 307.0% gain.  This trounced the S&P 500’s measly 39.7% gain over this span by nearly an entire order of magnitude!
After such a tremendous bull run, gold and the gold stocks needed to correct.  The metal was simply very overbought, as I warned right at its August 2011 top.  And the necessary gold correction, and the resulting GDX correction from its all-time record high, was totally normal until mid-2012.  At that point gold and the gold stocks bottomed.  The miners outperformed so the GGR climbed higher again for the better part of a year.
But in early 2013, the US Federal Reserve foolishly and recklessly chose to use record money printing to monetize bonds along with jawboning to drive the stock markets higher.  The Fed implied it was going to backstop stock prices, by being ready to ease more to arrest any material selloff.  So the stock markets started to dangerously levitate, gradually sucking capital and interest away from alternative investments including gold.
American stock traders dumped their GLD shares far faster than gold itself was being sold, which forced this massive ETF’s custodians to liquidate bullion to raise the capital necessary to sop up the excess GLD-share supply.  So GLD saw shockingly-large record outflows of 552.6 metric tons of gold last year, which was 84% of the total drop in global gold demand!  As gold fell, the gold stocks were pulled into the carnage.
Nothing was normal about last year, the Fed made it the most anomalous year in the markets seen in our lifetimes after the 2008 stock panic.  The resulting fear, despair, and loathing in precious metals was breathtakingly extreme.  Nearly everyone predicted gold, silver, and their miners’ stocks would continue sliding forever.  Except for a handful of hardcore contrarians like me, who argued they were bottoming.
We’ve been proven right, although this bottoming process has taken far longer than I ever imagined a year ago.  Despite facing howling headwinds since then as the Fed’s insane stock-market levitation continued, gold and the gold stocks have bottomed.  They’ve spent this past year basing, with big new buyers absorbing all the relentless selling pressure.  This has led to the GGR stabilizing since last summer.
And this ETF-based gold-stock/gold ratio is starting to break out from its incredible 7-year downtrend. Just in recent weeks, the GGR has poked its head above its secular resistance.  While it’s early still and we’ll need a few more months to confirm this nascent breakout, it has wildly bullish implications for gold-stock prices.  Contrarian investors willing to buy low in this past year when few others would are going to win fortunes.
Since the end of last June, the GGR has averaged 0.196x during this massive precious-metals basing.  That is anomalously low and utterly unsustainable.  Even during 2008’s wild stock panic, the most extreme fear superstorm most of us will ever see in our lifetimes, the GGR briefly hit a considerably-higher 0.227x before gold stocks bounced violently and surged for years relative to gold.  This should happen again.

After plummeting 71% in that stock panic, such extreme lows and unbalanced hyper-bearish sentiment led GDX to more than quadruple in the subsequent years.  And since that record peak this ETF has lost a nearly identical 69% and fallen to even more extreme lows relative to gold.  Thus I fully expect this next coming mean reversion in gold-stock price levels to quadruple them again, their upside potential is massive.

The entire history of the GDX/GLD Ratio since this gold-stock ETF was born in May 2006 averaged 0.405x.  And that is right in line with the post-panic normal range of this key gold-stock pricing indicator in the 10 calendar quarters following 2008’s stock panic, 0.419x.  So no matter what, the GGR ought to return to this normal range in the coming year or two.  From this week’s levels, that means a 107% GDX surge.

This next chart zooms in on the GGR and GDX itself over the past several years or so, highlighting how far up normal gold-stock valuations relative to gold are from here.  The case for a double in gold-stock prices from today’s dismal levels is a no-brainer, an exceedingly-high-probability-for-success contrarian trade.  Extreme price lows accompanied by extreme bearishness always breed extreme mean reversions.

As part of their year-long basing process, flushing out all the defeated capitulating former gold-stock investors who foolishly sold low, GDX hit a 5.1-year low in late December.  Gold stocks hadn’t traded at lower absolute price levels since 2008’s stock panic, after which they more than quadrupled.  But even more important was their pricing relative to gold, with the GGR falling to a sub-panic all-time record low.

And that’s the first of two reasons why a gold-stock quadruple is coming over the next several years or so.  Financial-market prices and sentiment are like a giant pendulum.  The farther they are pulled to one extreme by excessive greed or fear, the farther they necessarily swing to the opposite extreme in the subsequent mean reversion.  Like pendulums, these reversions don’t magically stop right in the middle at normal again.

Their kinetic momentum carries them through to the opposite ends of their arcs.  So there is almost no chance the next gold-stock cyclical bull will conveniently stop around the normal post-panic average GGR of 0.419x.  They are going to overshoot proportionally.  Doubling the 0.217x difference between today’s GGR and that average, and adding it onto today’s levels for a full overshoot, yields a GGR target of 0.636x.

That sounds high, and it is.  But overshoot extremes don’t last for long, as the universal greed necessary to fuel them quickly burns itself out.  And that GGR level certainly isn’t unprecedented.  In the second half of 2006, just after GDX was born when gold stocks were last popular, the GGR averaged 0.623x.  A standard mean-reversion overshoot of gold-stock prices relative to gold takes their projected gains to more than a triple.

The quadruple potential comes from gold itself, which is also universally hated and thus still trading at anomalous levels far below where it should be.  As the wildly overvalued and overextended US stock markets inevitably roll over into their next serious selloff that will likely grow into a new cyclical bear, gold will return to favor as an essential portfolio diversifier.  Western investment demand for it will come back.

Between American stock investors migrating capital back into GLD, and American futures speculators buying to cover their record precious-metals shorts, gold is going to rebound dramatically in the coming years.  And the higher gold goes, the higher gold stocks will need to be bid to keep the GGR in line.  Even plugging in very conservative numbers yields incredibly impressive gold-stock price-target levels.

For example, last year’s Fed-driven anomaly led gold to plunge 27.9%.  If it merely regained 25% from its year-end-2013 level, a pathetic mean reversion after such a wild extreme, it would hit $1507.  That’s a low gold price, as gold traded above that continuously for 21 months ending at last April’s gold panic.  Translate that into $150ish GLD terms, and a 0.63x GGR overshoot yields a GDX target price of $94.50!

That’s nearly a quadruple from today’s dismal GDX levels, and given the epic record money printing by the crazy Fed that’s just starting to come home to roost in the form of wicked inflation, I expect gold prices to surge to new record highs well above $2000 in the years to come.  So the resulting gold-stock target levels are far higher than this conservative example indicates.  Gold stocks are an incredible investment here!

And in addition to the mean reversion in gold prices igniting serious gold-stock buying, another catalyst is coming too.  The second quarter of 2013’s epic GLD capital outflows led to the worst quarter for gold in 93 years.  So many of the miners took huge non-cash writeoffs in Q2’13 for the resulting impairments of their gold projects.  These more than erased operating profits, leaving this sector temporarily devoid of earnings.

So with no conventional P/E ratios over the past year since those writeoffs, investors have shunned this sector not knowing how to value it.  But once Q2’14 earnings are reported in late July and August, Q2’13 will roll off the books.  Thus gold stocks will have price-to-earnings ratios again, and they will be super-low given gold stocks’ battered price levels.  This should spark a surge of heavy institutional buying.

Although owning GDX to ride this mean reversion is fine, a custom portfolio of expertly-handpicked individual gold miners with superior fundamentals will vastly outperform it.  GDX is overly-diversified, and the larger gold miners that will see smaller gains are heavily weighted.  At Zeal we’ve spent well over a decade researching gold and silver miners and explorers, and our accumulated expertise is priceless.

We just finished our latest 3-month deep-research project looking into the universe of junior gold producers trading in the US and Canada.  We started with 63 stocks and gradually whittled them down to our dozen fundamental favorites, all of which are profiled in depth in a fascinating new 23-page report just published this week.  Buy it now, learn about the best junior gold miners, and invest while gold stocks remain dirt-cheap in the summer doldrums!  They will likely be soaring this autumn.
The bottom line is the cheap gold stocks have been basing for an entire year now.  After the extreme once-in-a-lifetime Fed-driven GLD-selling anomaly in 2013, bearishness was epic.  Yet despite the ongoing stock-market-levitation headwinds, the precious metals and their miners’ stocks consolidated instead of spiraling into the abyss like everyone predicted.  New investors absorbed all of the relentless selling.

This strong basing has led to a nascent breakout from the tired 7-year trend of gold stocks underperforming gold.  Today this despised sector is radically undervalued relative to the metal which drives its profits and hence ultimately stock prices.  So as gold-stock prices and gold itself mean revert in the coming years, gold stocks should easily quadruple.  There’s no other sector in the stock markets with such bullish potential.

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Thousands of South African Gold Mine Workers Stop Work

Johannesburg, South Africa - Mine Workers on Strike
 
An estimated 90,000 South African gold miners have joined tens of thousands of labourers in other sectors on a strike seeking better wages, though their union has significantly scaled down the demands.
 
From earlier demands for increases of wages up to 60 percent for some workers, the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) is now calling for a 10% wage rise. The NUM is the largest union representing about 64% of South Africa's 120,000 gold miners
 
Last week the workers rejected an offer of a 6.5 percent rise - the same as the current annual rate of inflation.
 
The workers went ahead with their strike plans Tuesday despite President Jacob Zuma urged urging both sides to find a solution, saying: "A strike hurts both sides."
 
South Africa's gold industry though one of the biggest in the world, has been in decline in recent years, while the platinum sector is still recovering from violence during last year's strikes.
It has been estimated that the gold miners' strike could cost South Africa more than $30m (pounds20million) a day in lost output.
 
NUM is demanding an increase of at least 2,300 rands a month for entry level workers nearly 10 times what producers are willing to pay. Mine owners are warning that a steep increase in wages would make the gold mines unviable, leading to gold mines closing and thousands of jobs being lost, following a fall in the price of gold.
 
They say that their production costs have increased as they have had to dig ever deeper to extract gold.
 
Labour unrest since last year has left more than 50 people dead and put renewed pressure on Zuma ahead of elections next year. The rand last week slid to a four-year low.
 
With stoppages in auto and building sectors already hitting an economy suffering from slow growth and unemployment at 25 percent, strikes could cripple an industry that has produced a third of the world's bullion but is now in rapid decline.
 
For many years, South Africa was by far the world's largest gold producer and accounted for 68% of global output in 1970, reports the AFP news agency.
 
It has now come down in ranking to the 5th biggest, with just 6 percent of world production .
Unlike NUM, the more hardline group, the Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU), is pushing for 150 percent hike.
 
The strike " has officially started. There are people who have not gone underground," Charmane Russell, a spokeswoman for gold producers grouped in the Chamber of Mines, told Reuters.
It was aware of the "devastating" impact industrial action would have on the economy, the NUM said.
 
NUM spokesman Lesiba Seshoka had denied that a 60% pay rise demand was excessive, telling AFP: "If there are bosses that sit in air-conditioned offices earning millions a year, why can't they (miners) earn 7,000 ($700) basic a month?"
 
South Africans were shocked last year when police shot dead 34 platinum miners during an unofficial strike called by a rival union, which accused the NUM of being too close to the ANC government.
 
With stoppages in the auto industry and the construction sector already sapping the struggling economy, shutting gold mines could cripple an industry that has produced a third of the world's bullion but is now in rapid decline.
 
"If indeed we are going to have a protracted industrial action, it will impact negatively on the economy," minister Susan Shabangu said at a presidential briefing in Pretoria.
"If there is a need for government to intervene, we will engage the parties," she said.
 
Economists say South Africa's economy, already suffering from slow growth and high unemployment, call ill afford the lost output - from an industry shutdown in gold.

Monday, February 4, 2013

Ten Mining Stocks That Look Set To Rebound



Mining stocks have taken the brunt of the walloping on the sharemarket but the selling is largely indiscriminate, prompting many people to ask whether some resource stocks are oversold.

There are reasons to be wary though, as 334 miners have a weak cash balance, below $2 million – a level which usually rings alarm bells.

While E.I.M. Capital Managers director Tony Wiggins believes the sector is littered with value traps, he says “special situation” resource companies have potential.

These are miners that face corporate activity (such as those involved in takeovers) or close to achieving a significant milestone (such as making the transition from explorer to producer or reaching full-production capacity).

Experts speaking to The Australian Financial Review this week nominated the following 10 mining stocks as best placed to rebound in the coming months.

Sundance Resources (SDL)

The Africa-focused iron ore hopeful is one that fits the “special situations” bill well, Wiggins says. It’s been on a wild ride since Chinese shareholder Hanlong Mining Group made a takeover bid last year. But doubts about Hanlong’s ability to finance the takeover have cast a long shadow over Sundance Resources.
While Hanlong eventually secured financier commitment letters from two banks, the market is sceptical and the stock is trading well under the offer price of 45¢ a share.

“There’s a very low chance of the deal falling over now,” Tony Wiggins says. “People won’t believe it until the deal is consummated.” By then, however, the opportunity would have been lost.

Pluton Resources (PLV)

Scepticism is also dragging heavily on fellow iron ore miner Pluton Resources. Investors lost faith due to lengthy delays in securing finance for its acquisition of the Cockatoo Island project.

When Pluton completes its first iron ore shipment from Cockatoo, Wiggins says, it will convert the disbelievers. The project has no infrastructure issues and has a free-on-board cost of just $51 a tonne of iron ore before state royalties.

Kalnorth Gold Mines (KGM)

Set to transition from an explorer to a producer by February, this is another resource stock that will probably get a re-rating as its risk profile decreases.

Kalnorth has managed the transition well, having struck a deal with St Barbara to use its ore-processing mill rather than funding its own.

“What investors are getting is positive cash flow from early next year and no more dilution [from capital raisings],” says Wiggins.

Saracen Mineral Holdings (SAR)

The gold sector is a good place to be hunting for oversold bargains as economic conditions support the precious metal, Phillip Resources Fund’s chief investment officer, Chris Bain, says.

Gold producers with the biggest rebound potential, however, are likely to be those that can rein in ballooning costs in the December quarter.

“Saracen’s costs did blow out substantially but they’ve now got the credit facility in place for their expansion, their [ore] grades are improving and they seem to have costs under control,” Bain says.

If Saracen can control rising costs over the next two quarters, the stock is likely to find a 30 per cent or so upside, he predicts.

Saracen’s cash cost in the past quarter was about $900 an ounce of gold compared to $700-plus an ounce only a year ago.

Perseus Mining (PRU)

Having lost more than 20 per cent of its share price value over the past six weeks, Perseus Mining could rebound if the Sissingué gold project gets going in the Ivory Coast, Bain says. Political issues have dogged the project but the sell-off doesn’t seem to be justified given management’s delivery on promises and quality assets.

Silver Lake Resources (SLR)

Another goldminer whose stock has fallen about 20 per cent, Silver Lake Resources, is very much in the same category as Perseus.

A weaker than expected September quarter production result was one of the key drivers of its poor performance, says Troy Irvin, director of investment house Argonaut.

But, he says, its Mt Monger mine is “operationally sound with substantial productivity gains leading to higher volumes”.

Irvin favours Silver Lake’s acquisition of Integra Mining as it instantly makes the miner a producer of 250,000 ounces of gold a year, with the Murchison development project giving it potential to grow production to 400,000 ounces.

Argonaut has a “buy” recommendation on the stock and a price target of $4.40.

Troy Resources (TRY)

The South American-focused gold and copper producer is another of Irvin’s picks. Persistent sovereign risk concerns and cost inflation in Argentina had sparked a 14 per cent sell-off in the stock since early October.
News of a cost blowout at Barrick’s nearby Pascua Lama project in Chile is adding to anxiety. While Troy clearly has its challenges, the miner’s project is a high ore grade and high-margin proposition.

Further, Troy has a frugal capital structure with only 91 million shares on issue, and an enviable 13-year track record of paying dividends. Argonaut is urging investors to “buy” the stock with a $5.80 price target.

Tiger Resources (TGS)

It’s not only gold that is glittering. LimeStreet Capital believes the outlook for copper is also promising due to the lack of any significant new copper projects.

Tiger Resources could be an inviting takeover target by the big copper producers, according to LimeStreet.
Tiger has plunged 26 per cent this year, which seems excessive given strong cash flow and big earnings growth potential for 2012-13.

Rex Minerals (REX)

The junior copper-gold explorer is a riskier proposition, but Chris Bain thinks that it’s worth the punt following the 44 per cent collapse in its share price since January.

While Rex’s South Australian prospects look promising, it will need around $700 million to fund development work.

That’s a tough ask for a junior with a market capitalisation of about $150 million.

“They have a lot of hard work to do, but the asset is there, it’s valuable and it will become a mine,” Bain says.

“It’s a matter of whether the market is kind enough to let them raise the capital or someone says ‘I’ll have that thanks’.”

Rex did a capital raising not too long ago at $1.20 and the stock is trading around 80¢. Many investors are still hurting.

Mirabela Nickel (MBN)

While it seems counter intuitive for anyone to bat for Mirabela Nickel given the challenging outlook for nickel, Troy Irvin thinks that the risk has been more than factored into the miner’s share price after the stock shed two-thirds of its value in 12 months.

While nickel prices are hovering around a three-year low on concerns that the market is oversupplied, Mirabela’s operations are improving.

Its Santa Rita mine in Brazil, for example, has recorded consecutive improvement in its quarterly performance.

The miner has also completed a recent expansion and cost-cutting is starting to deliver results.

Mirabela is still profitable at current nickel prices and Irvin believes that it offers “unrivalled leverage” to any rebound in nickel prices.

View Source Article

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Bullion Miners Facing Tough Challenges


A new report from the world's largest gold producer Barrick Gold provides yet another illustration of the problems facing gold mining companies.

In South Africa, extraction of gold from depths of more than 6,000 meters has almost become the rule rather than the exception. Mining costs are being pushed up by the logistical challenges of drilling at great depths, as well as an increasingly militant work force which is demanding higher wages. Add exploration costs to this mix and it’s little wonder that companies’ profits are being squeezed, despite the high gold price. According to Barrick, total production costs for all mining companies exceeded the $8 billion mark last year.

While 1991 saw the discovery of 11 new gold mines, in 2011 only three mines with production potential were found. Aside from the drop in gold ore and rising production costs, a third factor is increasingly hindering gold production: producing countries' tedious licensing processes and sluggish bureaucracy. According to Barrick Gold, this is being exacerbated by increasing environmental regulations that could jeopardize many mining operations.

Many companies are also facing increasing hostility from residents in mining areas. This has been particularly evident in Peru, Bolivia or Ecuador – where there have been violent clashes between local people and police.

This is a  tricky set of factors for many companies. But given the gains in gold many expect in the coming years, great fortunes could still be made in the right gold mining investments.

View Source

Monday, September 10, 2012

Thirty Hunter Jobs at XStrata Lost As Miner Wields Axe

Thirty Hunter Jobs at XStrata Lost As Miner Wields Axe

ABOUT 30 Hunter Valley coal miners face the axe after Xstrata announced plans yesterday to slash 600 jobs in NSW and Queensland in response to low coal prices, high production costs and the strong Australian dollar. 
 
Union officials in the Hunter Valley said the mining giant intended to shed about 15 frontline jobs at its Ravensworth underground mine with a similar number expected to go at its Ulan underground mine, north of Mudgee.


Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union NSW northern district president Peter Jordan said members were told both mines would be scaled back from seven-day-a-week operations to five. He said delegates were "optimistic" affected staff could be re-deployed within Xstrata or managed through voluntary redundancies.

But he said there was no indication how many of the hundreds of contractors - who work at about a dozen of Xstrata's sites across the Hunter and the rest of NSW - would be impacted after the company said cuts would include both permanent staff and contractors.

BHP has also announced 300 jobs will go with the closure of its Gregory open cut at Emerald in Queensland.

"Xstrata Coal is undertaking a planned restructuring to respond to industry-wide pressures including low coal prices, high input costs and a strong Australian dollar against the US dollar. Following this review, and in keeping with the cost savings objectives announced at our half-year earnings, we will be reducing our employee numbers by approximately 600," Xstrata said.

Xstrata said cuts would also come from its corporate headquarters in Sydney and consolidating its office-based operations in Queensland.

"We do not expect a material impact on Australian production volumes," the company said.
However it confirmed growth projects at Ravens- worth North, Ulan West and its expansion at Rolleston were "proceeding"..

Mr O'Farrell said the loss of Xstrata jobs was "a body blow".

"It reflects not only national economic conditions, but it reflects a higher Australian dollar, lower prices for resources, and both are dictated by international conditions" he said.

Monday, September 3, 2012

Over Regulation Driving Mass Exodus in Australia's Resources Sector


The New Trend for Primary Sector resource Companies operating in Australia is to go offshore seeking reallocating their capital to projects with less overhead cost and greater certainty.

2012 Has seen the introduction of a Carbon Tax (Carbon Trading System) and a Mining Tax which combined with a heavily reduced Iron Ore price and weakening demand has seen any new or planned venture on paper, look far less economical.

There has been an incremental shift in Australian Companies increasing profiles overseas where the cost of business are seen as being significantly less such as Papua new guinea and South Africa.
The Australian Governments Justification for the Mining Tax (Resource Super Profits Tax) are basically two fold:

The Commodities Prices are rising so fast the taxation system is unable to stay in-line with the super normal profits mining companies are experiencing during this resources boom.


The Carbon Tax will also progressively increase the costs of production capabilities for miners and primary resource companies in an indirect way through increased costs such as electricity which is one key input to mining and yielding primary resources, some to a break even and shut down point where the cost of production is outstripped by costs and economics uncertainty. 

The outcome of these creeping legislation's are that incrementally Australian companies will and have been considering a more international approach as the disincentives to operate inside Australia grow to a level were companies will be forced into this position.

The eventuation is that the price put on commodities in Australia will ensure that they are plentiful for generations to come as the opportunity cost of mining in Alternate resource rich countries becomes too much. 

This Legislation is effectively creating commodities world where 3rd world countries seek out cheaper countries to do business in and in a way at least its almost like Australian Government was slow to catch on to Globalisation and outsourcing production to countries with cheaper labour and less Government Bureaucracy where businesses and economies thrive.

Monday, August 27, 2012

Australian Mining Boom Peak Years Away


THE government's efforts to talk up the longevity of the mining boom will be boosted today by an influential report that predicts mining industry investment is still several years away from peaking. 
And the report by economic forecaster BIS Shrapnel predicts other sectors of the economy will lift to fill the gap when the mining sector inevitably slows.

A series of cabinet ministers insisted yesterday the mining boom had further to run, in an attempt to counter fears of a slowdown after BHP Billiton's decision last week to shelve its $30 billion Olympic Dam expansion and Resource Minister Martin Ferguson's controversial declaration that the boom was over.

Against a dreary outlook for the prices of Australia's key exports, BIS Shrapnel believes the value of contracted resource projects means mining investment would not peak until 2014, with Queensland and Western Australia tied up with major projects for three to five years.

"After that, non-mining investment will stabilise and start to pick up, taking over as the engine of growth and smoothing the transition," says the BIS report, to be released today.

It suggests lower interest rates will boost retail spending, which had been held back by low confidence and weak demand rather than the Australian dollar.

"Over time, capacity constraints outside mining, such as those already evident in the construction sector, will prompt a broadening of investment beyond mining," it says.

Frank Gelber, chief economist at BIS Shrapnel, said the realisation that the investment mining boom was finite would cause people to "overreact on the pessimistic side".

"All of a sudden, the glass seems to have become one-quarter full, but nothing has changed," he told The Australian in a reference to Reserve Bank governor Glenn Stevens's optimistic glass-half-full depiction of Australia's economy.

"Our report aims to dispel some of the panicky discussion about the end of the boom," Mr Gelber said, predicting economic growth of 3 per cent this year and next.

BIS Shrapnel believes continued strong commodity prices will keep the Australian dollar high "for a few more years", putting pressure on other trade-exposed industries.

Trade Minister Craig Emerson said yesterday the mining boom was not even halfway through, while Workplace Relations Minister Bill Shorten noted that his department was projecting that another 100,000 jobs would be created in the mining industry over the next five years.

"Mr Ferguson is right: we might have reached the peak in prices, but volumes are still increasing and there are still plenty of projects," Mr Shorten said, attempting to paper over any divisions in cabinet.
"I don't think that the contribution that mining is going to make in jobs and economic output for Australia has at all peaked." Wayne Swan said the mining boom was better understood "as a series of booms - a boom in prices, a boom in investment and a boom in exports".

The Treasurer said that while the price boom had passed its peak, "the investment boom still has some way to run" and the Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics had forecast commodity export earnings to reach a record $209 billion this financial year as higher volumes offset lower prices.

JPMorgan chief China economist Haibin Zhu, visiting Sydney last week, told Sky Business's Australian Business on Friday night Chinese demand for Australia's resources would slow but remain at a very high level over the next five to 10 years.

"What follows the recent boom is going to be far from a bust," he said, pointing out the Chinese government was intent on stabilising the country's growth at a lower but more stable level.
He warned that China's one-child policy would sap its potential economic growth rate by about one-quarter within the next five to 10 years.

"The share of working-age people in the population is shrinking and the number of workers will start to decline in the next few years," he said.

Mr Gelber also dismissed the impact of the carbon tax on BHP's decision to shelve its Olympic Dam copper, gold and uranium mine expansion, arguing it would go ahead once construction costs eased. "Such a long-term project means it is hard to predict ultimate prices and demand," he said.

Mr Swan said he was "pleased" to see discussion about the longevity of the mining boom. "But behaving as if the investment pipeline has suddenly run dry is not only false, it's irresponsible," he said, pointing out the Reserve Bank governor had said mining investment would not peak for a few years yet.